By John Ubaldi, “Ubaldi Reports”

Of all the institutions in America that has to be a political is the U.S. Supreme Court, but in recent weeks this has all changed with the recent opinions by the court, which has President Biden and Democrats attacking the very legitimacy of this arbitrator of U.S. constitutional law.

As the U.S. Supreme Court term was coming to an end, the court released various controversial constitutional opinions regarding the second amendment, abortion, religious freedom, immigration and finally the federal government’s role in setting environmental policy.

What the U.S. Supreme Court set forth in its ruling was re-affirming the constitutional rights of the second amendment as a right equal to the other rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights and not a second tier right that has to gain permission from government to exercise.

The court also reaffirmed that the exercise of freedom of religion is a fundamental aspect of the rights that has been enshrined in the constitution as an embodiment of individual liberty shall be protected not curtailed.

Finally the U.S. Supreme Court reestablished the separation of powers and firmly placed limits on executive power in its ruling on the environment and immigration. In both cases the court ruled that the executive branch unduly took powers from the legislative branch.

The constitution has firmly bequeathed to Congress as the legislative branch that they are the arbitrators of crafting law with the executive branch the power to enforce, not the executive to make and enforce laws as they see fit.

Over the decades, Congress has abdicated that authority to the executive branch and in its ruling the Supreme Court was telling Congress it’s your responsibility to make the laws not the executive branch no matter how important the issue is.

Unfortunately, President Biden and Democrats have attacked the very legitimacy of the court because they didn’t rule there way.

President Biden while attending the G-7 and NATO Summits in Europe, held a rare press conference openly criticized the court stating, “I can understand why the American people are frustrated because of what the Supreme Court did.”

Even after the Courts decision overturning Roe V Wade the president stated, “Today is a — it’s not hyperbole to suggest a very solemn moment.  Today, the Supreme Court of the United States expressly took away a constitutional right from the American people that it had already recognized.”

What the court alluded to in its opinion that abortion was a right never codified in the federal constitution or in any of the other state constitutions, but instead referred this debate back to the various states by having the very voters of each given state decide for themselves what level of abortion they would codify or accept.

This is what the framers intended all along, for the voters to have a voice. This is what Democracy is all about!

The president took a partisan approach by blaming the previous administration, “It was three justices named by one President — Donald Trump — who were the core of today’s decision to upend the scales of justice and eliminate a fundamental right for women in this country.”

These appointments were done through the legal frame work of a sitting president’s constitutional authority as head of the executive branch of government. Incidentally, the liberal icon of former U.S. Supreme Court jurist Ruth Bader Ginsburg herself had qualms about the original basis for Roe v Wade.

Massachusetts Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren went further in her condemnation of the court’s decision, suggested to ABC’s This Week that expanding the court was an urgent matter.  She continued to rail against the ruling even suggesting that the court did not follow what would we want them to do.

For someone in Warren’s position that is a disturbing and fundamental flaw in her understanding of how the court works in the frame work of our constitutional republic.

Constitutional Law Professor at George Washington University Jonathan Turley recently wrote that the “Madisonian democracy is based on the premise that, despite our factional divisions, the Constitution creates an interest in all groups in preserving the system. While the Constitution does not guarantee that your views will prevail in Congress or the courts, it has proven the most stable and successful democratic system in history.  We are all invested in that system which has achieved transformative changes over time in our laws and our society.”

This hasn’t stopped members of Congress, the media, academia, and including a sitting U.S. president from attacking the very legitimize of the court, with many calling for court packing and eliminating the filibuster as remedies.

Instead of moderating the passion of the mob, these same individuals have advocated open hostility toward the court, by failing to callout protesters who demonstrate at the home of the justice as two of the justices have young child residing inside.

Even the leadership of the Democratic Party to include President Biden could not or would not condemn the attempted assignation of sitting Supreme Court Jurist.

This should be appalling to anyone who believes in the rule of law.

Could it be the main reason that President Biden, the Democratic Party and there surrogates are angry at the various rulings of the Supreme Court is that for years the court has ruled in their favor.

For decades Democrats have relied on the courts to pass their agenda that they were unable to get through legislatively on such issues as abortion, voting rights, healthcare, racial preferences, climate and economic regulation.  No matter the issue Democrats have relied on the court to do their bidding absent the constitutional authority of passing legislation.

Years have gone and with it the lines have been blurred of what was enumerated and often became unenumerated in the constitutional text.

What the court has done is enforce the separation of powers which have been eroded over the decades as the executive branch has usurped the power once relegated to the Congress. Democrats have allowed the courts to be sotto legislators absent of themselves to the jobs they were duly elected to do.

Instead of claiming plausible deniability and blaming the executive branch or having federal agencies to their bidding and institute regulations that would not pass via the normal legislative process; the court now has just placed back in restraints on each branch of government to get back into their perspective lane.

No matter how much President Biden and the Democratic Party tries to delegitimize the US Supreme Court, the court has placed its opinions back into the proper perspective on how they should have ruled all along.

The U.S. Supreme Court has in fact re-legitimized itself as the true stewards of our constitutional Republic.