By John Ubald, “Ubaldi Reports”

This month the nation celebrated the birth of America with reflections on the origins of the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution, but in in the spirit of both monumental documents that District Court Judge Terry Doughty issued a stunning rebuke to President Biden in his blatant violation of the first amendment by censoring the free speech of American citizens.

In ordinary times both political parties would have reacted with outright condemnation of a sitting U.S. president who dishonored the constitution which he swore to uphold, instead violated the fabric of the first amendment of American citizens by censoring what Americans could hear or read through censorship.

Instead we heard Democrats chastise the ruling by the federal judge and with the Biden administrations out right rebuking the ruling coupled with the fact they will refrain from altering the policy of censoring American’s first amendment rights by continuing their ongoing violation of the first amendment through censorship.

Where was the main stream media on this blatant violation of the first amendment with state sponsored censorship, instead the media replied with a muted response, or attacked the ruling as being a conservative conspiracy theory; despite mountains of evidence to the contrary?

The Reason Foundation’s Eric Boehm reported, “The underlying case alleges that coordination between government officials and social media companies including Meta (the owner of Facebook and Instagram) and Twitter routinely silenced opinions that challenged the mainstream narrative about the COVID-19 pandemic and other hot-button issues.”

What Judge Doughty alleges is supported by mountains of evidence to include disclosures found in the Twitter Files—a series by independent journalists—and the Facebook Files—on how the federal government pressured and coerced social media into doing the governments bidding. Judge Doughty in his ruling highlighted hundreds of messages sent federal employees of the FBI, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), other agencies, and individuals at the White House to moderators at Twitter, Meta (the parent company of Facebook and Instagram), and Google by making it abundantly clear the federal government wanted these platforms to suppress dissenting viewpoints on a wide range of topics.

In Judge Doughty’s ruling those topics allegedly included, Plaintiffs allege that Defendants suppressed conservative-leaning free speech, such as: (1) suppressing the Hunter Biden laptop story prior to the 2020 Presidential election; (2) suppressing speech about the lab-leak theory of COVID-19’s origin; (3) suppressing speech about the efficiency of masks and COVID-19 lockdowns; (4) suppressing speech about the efficiency of COVID-19 vaccines; (5) suppressing speech about election integrity in the 2020 presidential election; (6) suppressing speech about the security of voting by mail; (7) suppressing parody content about Defendants; (8) suppressing negative posts about the economy; and (9) suppressing negative posts about President Biden.

What is most alarming as Constitutional Law Professor at George Washington University Jonathan Turley wrote, “What is striking is not just the blind acceptance that the government should be protecting us from harmful thoughts. It is also the failure to recognize that the government was wrong on many of these points while experts were being banned and blacklisted.”

It’s interesting to note that Turley had testified six months before hand in front of Congress on the abuses by the Biden administration on utilizing social media companies as “censorship by surrogate.” Unfortunately he was mercilessly attacked by Democrats in that hearing at in later hearings.

The court has now vindicated Turley and others that a court has now found that the evidence overwhelmingly shows systematic violation of the First Amendment by the Biden administration. Judge Doughty found that the two states “are likely to succeed on the merits in establishing that the government has used its power to silence the opposition.”

The real question that needs to be asked when will Democrats wake up to the massive abuse of power despite mountains of evidence showing systemic censorship by the Biden administration regarding this unprecedented collusion involving government, corporate and academic powers? This has unveiled the largest and the deepest censorship in the nation’s history.

In Judge Doughty’s ruling he stated that the government used layers of coordination and consultation to “assume a role similar to an Orwellian ‘Ministry of Truth.’” The court found that “the censorship alleged in this case almost exclusively targeted conservative speech.”

All Americans no matter your political affiliation should be appalled at the massive censorship by the federal government and Biden administration who worked in conjunction with social media companies for “the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech.”

In Doughty’s ruling he listed various agencies and names that include the Department of Justice, State Department, Department of Health and Human Services, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as well as individual officials like Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and Jen Easterly, who leads the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.

Democrats ignore, fail or just don’t want to know maybe for partisan political purposes of the massive censorship involved much of it coming from the recent “Twitter Files” all the while attacking every witness who dare mention or discuss those files.

Turley even mentioned that this censorship system included funding groups to blacklist targeted individuals and sites. With the help of companies like Microsoft, federal agencies poured millions into efforts to target not just social media accounts but the advertisers for conservative sites.

When the Democrats controlled both the House and the Senate they refused to investigate and would deny that any form of censorship is being conducted labeling anyone bring ups such baseless accusations as conspiracy theories with no evidence to support these claims.

In previous hearing, former Twitter executive Anika Collier Navaroli testified on how she and her staff approached censorship. Navaroli said they pushed to remove anything they considered “dog whistles” and “coded” messaging; she said they refused to prioritize the free speech of posters but, instead, asked “whose free expression are we protecting at the expense of whose safety.” She said they were unwilling to allow the safety of others “to go to the winds so that people can speak freely.”

Former Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal that the company would “focus less on thinking about free speech” and more on “who can be heard.” Once the Twitter Files were opened we learned that the federal government funneled thousands of names and sites on who should not be heard and who needed to be censored.

It’s interesting to note those that claim to be protecting Democracy are the very ones who are destroying America’s constitutional Republic!